Showing posts with label wants. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wants. Show all posts

Thursday, May 24, 2012

Johnny Knox, after spinal fusion, wants to play this year, but is not rushing it

Posted: 04:15 PM ET May 23, 2012

By Josh Katzowitz | NFL Blogger

It sounds like there's a good chance we won't be seeing much of Knox this year. (US Presswire) By his own account, since Bears receiver Johnny Knox had spinal fusion surgery, he's lost 30 pounds. Though he told reporters Wednesday he'd gained back about 10 pounds of that, he's nowhere close to being ready to play.

Like we told you two months ago, there's a good chance Knox, after taking a bad hit from Anthony Hargrove last season that led to a vertebrae fracture (you can see the GIF of the play here), won't play this season.

“I want to get back out there at the beginning of the season, but who knows?” Knox said. “We're going to see how that turns out.”

What about the possibility of missing all of 2012?

“It could happen, but I'm staying optimistic," he said. ... I'm not in no rush. This is my spine, the core of my body I'm dealing with. It's not my knee or my ankle or my shoulder. I'm taking my time on this.”

As he should.

For more NFL news, rumors and analysis, follow @EyeOnNFL on Twitter, and subscribe to our Pick-6 Podcast and NFL newsletter. You can follow Josh Katzowitz on Twitter here: @joshkatzowitz.

Tags: Anthony Hargrove, Johnny Knox, Chicago Bears, NFL

View the original article here

Saturday, April 28, 2012

San Francisco wants Super Bowl L in its new stadium

Posted: 03:24 PM ET April 16, 2012

By Josh Katzowitz | NFL Blogger

Will the Super Bowl L trophy be raised in San Francisco's new stadium? The Bay Area hopes so. (Getty) The Super Bowl location rotation is set for the next three years. In 2013, we'll head to New Orleans, then New York/New Jersey in 2014 and Glendale, Ariz., in 2015. If the city of San Francisco has its way, Super Bowl L will be live from the Bay Area.

That's the word from the Sacramento Bee, which reports that the 49ers want their new $1.02 billion stadium to play host to the Super Bowl in February 2016.

The new stadium will be located in Santa Clara, and since an NFL team has to play in a stadium for two seasons before a Super Bowl can be played there, that stadium would have to be ready for the start of the 49ers 2014 season.

As the Bee notes, interested cities can begin applying to the Super Bowl Advisory Committee to bid, and in October, the committee will decide on finalists. The NFL then likely will announce the winner of Super Bowl L in May 2013.

It'll be interesting, though, to see if Los Angeles can secure an NFL team in the next few years, because the league placing Super Bowl L in L.A, the site of Super Bowl I, would make plenty of sense (symbolically, at least).

If San Francisco ultimately doesn't win the right to host the Super Bowl in 2016, the 49ers would apply to play host to Super Bowl LI.

For more NFL news, rumors and analysis, follow @EyeOnNFL on Twitter, and subscribe to our Pick-6 Podcast and NFL newsletter. You can follow Josh Katzowitz on Twitter here: @joshkatzowitz.

Tags: San Francisco 49ers, NFL

View the original article here

Friday, April 27, 2012

What Payton wants is obvious, but why would Saints want it, too?

Sean Payton (right) passed over esteemed OC Pete Carmichael (left) for the interim job. (US Presswire) Sean Payton (right) passed over esteemed OC Pete Carmichael (left) for the interim job. (US Presswire)

Sean Payton, smartest guy in every room he has ever walked into, thought he could do what he did and not get busted. Can you believe that? He thought he could get away with it.

I'm not talking about the bounty system his team used to target and then savage opposing players. I'm talking about the stuff that came afterward. The interim coach who was picked to replace Payton. I'm talking about that.

Once an arrogant SOB, always an arrogant SOB. That's Sean Payton, and then some. Arrogant, smarter-than-thou, the whole thing. He's a piece of work, this guy, because what he has done -- what he thought he could do, and get away with it -- is sacrifice New Orleans' 2012 season to serve the greater good.

The greater good being the star power of Sean Payton.

Look at the convoluted road the Saints traveled to pick a replacement for Payton, a process that Payton was allowed to oversee because, well, I'm not sure how to finish that thought. Because I'm not sure why Sean Payton, who has been such a wonderful Saints employee that he got himself suspended for a full season, was allowed to handpick the guy who would replace him.

All I know is Sean Payton handpicked some of the most obviously non-threatening guys he could. And I know why: Because Sean Payton is all about Sean Payton. Even as he has overseen three years of outrageous behavior that gutted the Saints -- cost them their head coach for 16 games, another coach for six games, their general manager for eight games, plus draft picks and fines -- Sean Payton made the call to replace Sean Payton with men who would do the job fairly well.

But not too well.

Because if someone did the job too well, um, that could cause a problem in 2013 when it's time for Sean Payton to return as head coach. Who needs or even wants Payton, that bounty-ignoring monster, if the Saints just went 13-3 without him?

So the first guy Payton tried to hire was his buddy Bill Parcells, who hasn't been good in years and who would have taken the job with a clear expiration date. Parcells turns 71 soon, and he wouldn't have been a threat to stay as head coach even if he'd turned back the clock to 1990 and gone 13-3. For one season Parcells would have replaced Payton as a favor to Payton, and then Parcells would have gotten the heck out of there.

Parcells was the perfect hire for Payton, but it didn't work out. Michael Lombardi at NFL.com posited the theory that it didn't work out because another member of the Saints' suspended posse, general manager Mickey Loomis, didn't want Parcells because Parcells -- while not a threat to Payton -- would have represented a threat to Mickey Loomis. Is that one true? No idea. Interesting theory, but I have no idea if Mickey Loomis operates in all-about-me mode.

Sean Payton? He lives in all-about-me mode, right down to the way he appeared at a Final Four concert next to Jimmy Buffett, who wore a T-shirt that said "Free Sean Payton." After Parcells said no, Payton turned to Joe Vitt. You know, the guy who can't even coach the first six games because he's suspended for the same reason as Payton. An interim coach gets no less threatening than one who can't even coach the whole season. Whatever happens in 2012, however good the season could theoretically go for the Saints, Vitt's impact will be marginalized by his six-game suspension.

But my suspicion is the Saints' 2012 season won't go that well at all, which I suspect would suit Sean Payton just fine. He wants to return in April 2013 as a martyr and a white knight, riding in from the wilderness to save the day. He can't save the day if the Saints go 13-3 in 2012, but he can sure save it if they're 8-8 or something similar.

And really, what else are the Saints going to do -- even with all that talent -- given the rudderless way they'll lurch through the 2012 season? One coach for six games, Joe Vitt for the next 10. Keep in mind, Joe Vitt is not head-coach material. That's an important fact here, because the Saints have another guy on staff who absolutely is head-coach material. But Sean Payton didn't turn to that guy as the interim coach. Didn't even consider him, from what I can gather.

Pete Carmichael is his name. He's the Saints offensive coordinator, X-and-O whiz kid, only 40 years old, close with quarterback Drew Brees. He's the next Sean Payton, is what he is, and he's so highly regarded around the league that he has been summoned by the Raiders and Colts to interview for head-coaching positions. But for his own franchise, sorry: You may be good, Pete Carmichael -- but you're no Joe Vitt.

See, Payton can't afford to have the Saints got 13-3 next season under Carmichael. That happens, and other teams would line up to hire Carmichael, and what then? You'd have Saints fans wondering if maybe the Saints should cut loose the tainted Sean Payton -- what's he done for us lately, anyway? -- and keep Pete Carmichael.

Payton can't have that. So he's not promoting Carmichael, which as an added bonus increases the odds that Carmichael returns in 2013 as the Saints offensive coordinator. It's diabolical micro-management, what I'm suggesting, but anyone who knows anything about Sean Payton knows he is capable of being that diabolical, and that micro-managing.

What I can't understand is why the Saints are letting him do it.


View the original article here

Monday, June 20, 2011

Newton say he wants Smith to stay in Carolina

CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- Carolina Panthers receiver Steve Smith says he briefly contemplated retiring this offseason as his wife dealt with health issues.

Now that tests have shown she doesn't have lupus, Smith is looking forward to proving he still can be an elite receiver at age 32. But whether the four-time Pro Bowl pick will be paired with No. 1 overall pick Cam Newton remains uncertain.

After Smith sidestepped questions Friday on whether he wants to return to Carolina, Newton made a sales pitch at Smith's youth football camp, Newton told a child he wanted to play for Carolina because it had the top pick "and I wanted to have someone great to throw to."

Asked later if he said that in hopes of swaying Smith, Newton smiled and replied, "Hopefully, he got the message."


View the original article here